Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jurgen Briand vs Florent Bax Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Briand vs Bax analysis and find out who is favored!
Jurgen Briand vs Florent Bax Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Briand 1 - 0 Bax
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Briand has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bax has won 51.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Briand, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bax has won 48.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Briand has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bax has saved 57.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Briand has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Bax winning 61.29% (W/L 38/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Briand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 38/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 41/ 30). Bax has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 119/ 72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Briand has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Bax has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 35/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Briand winning 1 times and Bax being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Briand winning 2 and Bax winning 1. The last match between Briand and Bax was at the M25 Bourg-en-Bresse, 30-06-2021, First, Clay with Jurgen Briand getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Briand and Bax have played a deciding set 1 times, with Briand winning 1 times and Bax 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Briand winning 0, and Bax 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Briand has played against opponents with an average rank of 466 while Bax has played against players with an average rank of 174.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Briand has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bax has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Briand has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bax has converted 40.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
898
Rank
403
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
625
Rank
537
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
60% (157-106)
Career Total W/L
60% (170-112)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
61% (22-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jurgen Briand | Florent Bax |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (44/77) | 63% (49/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (32/44) | 63% (31/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (16/33) | 41% (12/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (35/78) | 38% (29/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Jurgen Briand
Player
Florent Bax
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jurgen Briand | Florent Bax |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 61% (22/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (47/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (391/330) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (16/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 98 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 60 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:31:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 193.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (1247/2062) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (890/1247) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (416/815) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (90/228) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (847/2131) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (19/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (22/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 14% (14/2) |
Jurgen Briand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Jurgen Briand
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Jurgen Briand
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Jurgen Briand
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Jurgen Briand
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Daniil Glinka
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Maik Steiner
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Jurgen Briand
59%
(
79 of
134)
1st Serve %
49%
(
52 of
107)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
50 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Jurgen Briand
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Jurgen Briand
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Florent Bax Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Florent Bax
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Gabriele Maria Noce
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Florent Bax
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Filip Gabriel Bara
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
70 of
123)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Florent Bax
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
17 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Finn Bass
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Florent Bax
68%
(
77 of
114)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
116)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
2-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Mihai Alexandru Coman
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
83%
(
53 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Briand Vs Bax Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Briand are available here and Bax photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
